Jilla Vanover v. Alan Shams
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JILLA N. VANOVER, RN, BSN, BA, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ANGELTOUCH HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. ALAN SHAMS; CYNTHIA SHAMS; CHARLES JAMES SWEDISH, Attorney at Law; BANK OF NEW YORK; SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC; ADAMS WHITE; ERIC WHITE; J. SILVER, Mr.; R. LUECK, Mr., Revenue Officer, AGM; MR. CONTE, Collector; DEBORAH C. STANLEY, Ms., Associate Area Council in Richmond; MICHAEL LENIHAM, Mr. Technical Service Advisory Group Manager; MRS. HANA, Auditor; MRS. CARR, Supervisor of Auditors; FATEMEH NAJAFIAN, Ms., MD; THOMAS KIM, Mr., Special Agent, Special Inquiries and Intelligence Division, Department of Treasury, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01037-LMB-IDD)
May 28, 2009
June 5, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jilla N. Vanover, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Todd Freeman, SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Ronald James Guillot, Jr., SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Jonathan S. Cohen, Christine Durney Mason, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Robert K. Coulter, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Jilla N. Vanover appeals the district court's order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Vanover v. Shams, No. 1:08-cv-01037-LMB-
by the district court.
IDD (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 23, 2008 & entered Oct. 23, 2008; Oct. 28, facts 2008). legal before We dispense with are and oral argument because in aid the the the
contentions the court
decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?