Johnnie Robinson v. Presbyterian Wound Care Center
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JOHNNIE MAE ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRESBYTERIAN WOUND CARE CENTER, Defendant Appellee, and JAN PICKETT, Nurse Practitioner; TAMMY HAY, MEMA Employee; WENDY GEORGE, Manager for Meridian Health Care, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00021-FDW-DCK)
September 3, 2009
September 21, 2009
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnnie Mae Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Eaton Kelly, Kathleen Kanable Lucchesi, JOHNSTON, ALLISON & HORD, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Johnnie Mae Robinson appeals the jury's verdict in
favor of the Appellee on Robinson's complaint of racial and age discrimination and retaliation. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
To the extent that Robinson appeals the judgment based on the proceedings the record of the jury trial a or summary judgment of those
An appellant has the burden of including in the
record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceedings material to the issues raised on appeal. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(c). See Fed. R. App. P.
An appellant proceeding on appeal in
forma pauperis is entitled to transcripts at government expense only if the trial judge or a circuit judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous but presents a substantial question. U.S.C. § 753(f) (2006). certify Robinson's 28
Here, the district court declined to We have reviewed the record
including the affidavits, motions, and exhibits, and conclude that no error appears on the record before us and Robinson does not present a substantial question on appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 753(f). transcripts We at therefore find that she does not qualify with for oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?