UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CLAIR LOVERIDGE, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:03-cr-00063-IMK; 1:06-cv-00006-IMK)
March 17, 2009
March 24, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clair Loveridge, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Clair Loveridge petitions for a writ of mandamus
asking this court to review alleged sentencing errors by the district court. mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Loan Ass'n, is 860 a F.2d drastic 135, 138 (4th and In re First Fed. Sav. & Cir. 1988). only be Further, used in We conclude that Loveridge is not entitled to
Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for
In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.
The relief sought by Loveridge is not available by way of mandamus. mandamus. legal before Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
contentions the court
process. PETITION DENIED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?