George LaRoque v. Sara Conti

Filing 920090623

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1174 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1175 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1176 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1177 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, 2 and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1186 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. No. 09-1263 GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. 3 SARA A. CONTI, Defendant Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00569NCT; 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; 1:08-cv-00663-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568-NCT; 1:09-cv-00078-NCT) Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 23, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Paul LaRoque, Appellant Pro Se. Pro Se. Sara A. Conti, Appellee Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 4 PER CURIAM: George orders dismissing Paul his LaRoque appeals appeals from the the district court's and bankruptcy court denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm LaRoque v. Conti, 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; (M.D.N.C. for the reasons stated by the district court. Nos. 1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00569-NCT; 1:08-cv-00663-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568-NCT; 1:09-00078-NCT Jan. 30, 2009 & Feb. 13, 2009). We grant LaRoque's motions to consolidate his appeals and deny his motions for transcripts and a certified copy of the record at government the expense. and We legal dispense with oral argument because facts contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?