George LaRoque v. Sara Conti

Filing 920090623

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1174

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant ­ Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor.

No. 09-1175

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant ­ Appellee, and

MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor.

No. 09-1176

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant ­ Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor.

No. 09-1177

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant ­ Appellee, 2

and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor.

No. 09-1186

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. SARA A. CONTI, Defendant ­ Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor.

No. 09-1263

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v.

3

SARA A. CONTI, Defendant ­ Appellee, and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator, Party-in-Interest, ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE, Debtor.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00569NCT; 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; 1:08-cv-00663-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568-NCT; 1:09-cv-00078-NCT)

Submitted:

June 18, 2009

Decided:

June 23, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Paul LaRoque, Appellant Pro Se. Pro Se.

Sara A. Conti, Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

4

PER CURIAM: George orders dismissing Paul his LaRoque appeals appeals from the the district court's and

bankruptcy

court

denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis. the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm LaRoque v. Conti, 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; (M.D.N.C.

for the reasons stated by the district court. Nos. 1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00569-NCT;

1:08-cv-00663-NCT;

1:08-cv-00568-NCT;

1:09-00078-NCT

Jan. 30, 2009 & Feb. 13, 2009).

We grant LaRoque's motions to

consolidate his appeals and deny his motions for transcripts and a certified copy of the record at government the expense. and We legal

dispense

with

oral

argument

because

facts

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

5