Michael Pack v. Frederick Bealefield, III

Filing 920090626

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1217 MICHAEL L. PACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER FREDERICK Police Department, BEALEFIELD, III, Baltimore City Defendant - Appellee. No. 09-1218 MICHAEL L. PACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. PAUL WEIDEFIELD, Maryland Transit Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis and J. Frederick Motz, District Judges. (1:09-cv-00207-AMD; 1:09-cv-00208-JFM) Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 26, 2009 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael L. Pack, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Michael L. Pack appeals district court orders summarily dismissing without prejudice his civil rights complaints for failing to state a claim. free to amend the complaints to cure the defects. Pack was A dismissal without prejudice is not reviewable by this court unless the reasons stated for the dismissal clearly disclose that no amendment to the complaint could cure its defects. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 6667 (4th Cir. 1993). Because Pack could cure the defect in each Id. We dispense with oral complaint, we dismiss the appeals. argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?