John Goff, Jr. v. Baltimore County

Filing 920090707

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1261

JOHN A. GOFF, JR., individually and as parent and next friend of his minor children, J.G., III, S.M.G., J.A.G.; CARRIE A. GOFF, individually and as parent and next friend of her minor children, J.G., III, S.M.G., J.A.G., Plaintiffs ­ Appellants, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY; BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOSEPH HARDEN, Officer #4984, individually and in his official capacity; AARON MAISANO, Officer #5120, individually and in his official capacity; MARGARET HEIN, Officer #4617, individually and in her official capacity; DERYCK LEE, Officer #4697, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants ­ Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Susan K. Gauvey, Magistrate Judge. (1:08-cv-00557-SKG)

Submitted:

June 11, 2009

Decided:

July 7, 2009

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Goff, Jr., Carrie A. Goff, Appellants Pro Se. Mayhew, Assistant Counsel, BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Paul M. OF LAW,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM: John magistrate A. Goff, order Jr. and Carrie A. Goff for appeal the in

judge's

entering

judgment

Defendants

accordance with the jury's verdict. *

The Goffs brought suit

alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and Maryland law. The Goffs have not provided a transcript, and they fail to

establish a basis to have the transcript prepared at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2006). We have reviewed the

existing record and the issues the Goffs raise on appeal, and find no grounds for appellate relief. the magistrate judge's order. Accordingly, we affirm

Goff v. Baltimore County, No. We dispense with oral

1:08-cv-00557-SKG (D. Md. Feb. 6, 2009).

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).

*

3