John Black v. New Jersey
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JOHN D. BLACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY, Government; CITY OF NEWARK, a municipal corporation of the state of New Jersey; RONALD RICE, New Jersey State Senator; HOMEDEPORE, NJ; ANDTE SIGMONE; LUIS PROPERTIES, LLC; NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE SERVICE COMMISSION; JAMES SHARP; CORY BOOKER, Mayor of Newark, NJ, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00193-F)
October 15, 2009
October 19, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John D. Black, Appellant Pro Se. Albert D. Barnes, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Trenton, New Jersey; Wayne Joseph Martorelli, Deputy Attorney General, Trenton, New Jersey; Charles Edward Raynal, IV, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ronald H. Garber, BOXLEY, BOLTON, GARBER & HAYWOOD, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: John dismissing his D. Black appeals for the district court's We order have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
Accordingly, dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Black v. We legal
New Jersey, No. 5:08-cv-00193-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2009). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?