Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Charles Johnson
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES JOHNSON, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services; KATHY WHIPPLE, Acting Director, United States Office of Personnel Management; ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID STUDIES; SECRETARY OF UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; CHRISTOPHER SCOLESE, Acting Administrator, NASA, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-00351)
July 30, 2009
August 4, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lawrence petition in the Verline district Wilder, court, Sr., filed a mandamus of
counsel and seeking to compel the defendants to assist him in applying for disability and worker's compensation benefits. The
district court entered an order granting Wilder leave to proceed in forma pauperis and placing his case on inactive status
pending resolution of cases Wilder has on the court's active docket. Wilder seeks to appeal, challenging the denial of
appointment of counsel.
This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Because the order Wilder seeks to appeal
is not immediately appealable, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?