Pramco II, LLC v. David Kissi

Filing 920091201

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1413

PRAMCO II, LLC; EMIL HIRSCH; O'CONNOR & HANNAN, LLP, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. DAVID M. KISSI, Individually and in his capacity as CoTrustee of the Ammendale Living Trust, Defendant ­ Appellant, and EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI; AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST, Defendants, DAVID MUCHOW, Respondent, CHRISTOPHER BOWMAR MEAD; RICHARD M. KREMEN; JOSE ANDRADE; DLA PIPER US LLP; ROBERT ERIC GREENBERG, Parties-in-Interest, AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST, Garnishee, v. MICHAEL PEARSON; BENNETT AND BAIR, LLP, Movants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:03-cv-02241-PJM)

Submitted:

November 19, 2009

Decided:

December 1, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Emil Hirsch, James Patrick Ryan, NOSSAMAN, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM: David M. Kissi seeks to appeal the district court's order denying without prejudice the plaintiffs' motion to reopen the underlying proceedings. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Kissi seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. DISMISSED

3