Pramco II, LLC v. David Kissi

Filing 920091201

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1413 PRAMCO II, LLC; EMIL HIRSCH; O'CONNOR & HANNAN, LLP, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. DAVID M. KISSI, Individually and in his capacity as CoTrustee of the Ammendale Living Trust, Defendant Appellant, and EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI; AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST, Defendants, DAVID MUCHOW, Respondent, CHRISTOPHER BOWMAR MEAD; RICHARD M. KREMEN; JOSE ANDRADE; DLA PIPER US LLP; ROBERT ERIC GREENBERG, Parties-in-Interest, AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST, Garnishee, v. MICHAEL PEARSON; BENNETT AND BAIR, LLP, Movants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:03-cv-02241-PJM) Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 1, 2009 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Emil Hirsch, James Patrick Ryan, NOSSAMAN, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: David M. Kissi seeks to appeal the district court's order denying without prejudice the plaintiffs' motion to reopen the underlying proceedings. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Kissi seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?