Joseph Barr v. Lexington County School Distri

Filing 920091020

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1419 JOSEPH LEE BARR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEXINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT THREE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:07-cv-01351-JFA-PJG) Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 20, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Lee Barr, Appellant Pro Se. David Thomas Duff, Bryn Colette Sarvis, Breon C.M. Walker, DUFF, WHITE & TURNER, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph Lee Barr appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Barr's claims of racial discrimination, retaliation, breach of contract, and negligence. With respect to Barr's latter three claims, Barr has failed to challenge on appeal the court's basis for granting summary judgment for the Appellee. We therefore find that Barr has forfeited appellate review of those claims. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). discrimination, reversible error. we have With respect to Barr's claim of racial reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Barr v. Lexington County Sch. Dist., No. We dispense with contentions the court are and by the district court. 3:07-cv-01351-JFA-PJG (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2009). oral argument because in the the facts and legal before adequately presented materials argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?