UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
July 21, 2009
August 14, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Tyrone Hurt petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing of the "to U.S. rule District or Court for on the Eastern civil
action complaints pending [sic]." actions or complaints. only Dist. in extraordinary 426 U.S.
He identified none of those
Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used circumstances. 394, 402 Kerr v. United States is
available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re: First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d A mandamus petitioner must show that
135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).
he has a clear right to the relief sought, that the respondent has a clear duty to perform the particular act requested, and that the plaintiff has no other adequate remedy. Id.
We find that Hurt has not made the required showing. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. The motion to send
Hurt all final orders and opinions from this court is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?