Joseph Roberts v. Michael Astrue

Filing 402841893

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:07-cv-03417-HMH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998358404] [09-1467]

Download PDF
Case: 09-1467 Document: 34 Date Filed: 06/14/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1467 JOSEPH M. ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:07-cv-03417-HMH) Submitted: May 24, 2010 Decided: June 14, 2010 Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robertson H. Wendt, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF ROBERTSON WENDT, North Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. W. Walter Wilkins, United States Attorney, Marvin J. Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael A. Thomas, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Donna L. Calvert, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Gary Sultz, Assistant Regional Counsel, Sandra T. Krider, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Office of the General Counsel, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee. Case: 09-1467 Document: 34 Date Filed: 06/14/2010 Page: 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Case: 09-1467 Document: 34 Date Filed: 06/14/2010 Page: 3 PER CURIAM: Joseph M. Roberts appeals the district court's order accepting affirming the the recommendation Commissioner's of the magistrate denying judge and decision Roberts' applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Roberts v. Astrue, No. 9:07-cv-03417-HMH We dispense with oral argument because by the district court. (D.S.C. Feb. 20, 2009). the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?