Beverly Byrd v. Gregory Johnson
Filing
402867300
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:06-cv-02704-AW,BK-04-35620,BK-01-25006,AP-06-02008 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998369838] [09-1533]
Beverly Byrd v. Gregory Johnson
Doc. 402867300
Case: 09-1533
Document: 17
Date Filed: 06/29/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1533
In Re:
BEVERLY BYRD; RALPH T. BYRD, Debtors.
----------------------------------BEVERLY BYRD; RALPH T. BYRD, Debtors Appellants, v. GREGORY P. JOHNSON, Trustee Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:06-cv-02704-AW; BK-04-35620; BK-01-25006; AP-0602008)
Submitted:
June 24, 2010
Decided:
June 29, 2010
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ralph T. Byrd, Laytonsville, Maryland, for Appellants. Martin Hoffman, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.
James
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 09-1533
Document: 17
Date Filed: 06/29/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Ralph and Beverly Byrd appeal the district court's
orders affirming the order of the bankruptcy court directing the Chapter 13 trustee to disburse to the Appellee all funds held by the Chapter 13 trustee in partial payment of the allowed
administrative expenses of Ralph's bankruptcy case while under Chapter 7 and Chapter We 11, and denying the their motion and find for no
reconsideration. reversible error.
have
reviewed
record
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Byrd v. Johnson, No. 8:06-cv-02704 (D. Apr. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral
by the district court. Md. Mar. 23, 2009 &
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?