Icilma Burroughs v. ScottMadden Incorporated
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ICILMA BURROUGHS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SCOTTMADDEN, INCORPORATED, Defendant Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00193-F)
March 29, 2010
April 19, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angela Newell Gray, GRAY NEWELL, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gregory W. Brown, BROWN LAW, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Icilma granting Burroughs appeals to the district court's order
alleging claims of employment discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006) and §§ 2000e 2000e-17 and (2006) and 42 U.S.C. of
emotional distress. reversible error. by the district
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated court. Burroughs v. ScottMadden, Inc., No.
5:07-cv-00193-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 2009).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?