Harald Schmidt v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
HARALD SCHMIDT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A., Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00165-JCC-JFA)
February 8, 2010
March 9, 2010
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harald Schmidt, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Metcoff GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Harald inter alia, Schmidt appeals an the district award of court's and order,
arbitration in favor
attorneys' Dakota) N.A. error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Schmidt v. Citibank, No. 1:08-cv-00165-JCC-JFA 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
district court. (E.D. Va. Apr.
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?