US v. Bobby Holland

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for abeyance (Local Rule 12(d)) [998300782-2] Originating case number: 5:07-cv-00445-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998422102] [09-1636]

US v. Bobby Holland

Doc. 0

Case: 09-1636 Document: 45

Date Filed: 09/10/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1636 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BOBBY N. HOLLAND; BOBBY HOLLAND; REBECCA HOLLAND, N. HOLLAND, Trustee; JACQUELYN

Defendants - Appellants, OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee, and H&R BLOCK MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00445-BO) Submitted: August 27, 2010 Decided: September 10, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 09-1636 Document: 45

Date Filed: 09/10/2010

Page: 2

Bobby N. Holland, Jacquelyn Holland, Rebecca Holland, Appellants Pro Se. Ivan C. Dale, Jan M. Geht, Teresa E. McLaughlin, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, DC; Joseph H. Nanney, Jr., Kevin J. Stanfield, WYRICK, ROBBINS, YATES & PONTON, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Case: 09-1636 Document: 45

Date Filed: 09/10/2010

Page: 3

PER CURIAM: Bobby N. Holland, Bobby N. Holland as Trustee,

Jacquelyn Holland, and Rebecca Holland appeal two district court orders. The first order granted summary judgment to the

Government and Option One Mortgage Corporation, reduced various tax liens to judgment, and ordered the sale of real property at 1805 Trinity Road in Raleigh, North Carolina. The second order

granted the Government's motion to reconsider and amended the amount of the assessments as of September 15, 2008. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we deny Appellants' motion for abeyance and We have

Accordingly, for the

affirm

reasons stated by the district court.

See United States v.

Holland, No. 5:07-cv-00445-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Apr. 29, 2009 & entered Apr. 30, 2009; filed Aug. 13, 2009 & entered Aug. 14, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional

would

process. AFFIRMED

3