Engra Bellamy v. Alyssa Wells
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:07-cv-00035-sgw Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998629383]. [09-1702]
Appeal: 09-1702
Document: 29
Date Filed: 07/12/2011
Page: 1 of 4
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1702
ENGRA M. BELLAMY,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ALYSSA CAMPBELL WELLS; BRENT UZDANOVICS,
Defendants – Appellants,
and
DOUG DAVIS, Waynesboro Police Department; WAYNESBORO POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
Samuel G. Wilson,
District Judge. (5:07-cv-00035-sgw)
Submitted:
March 29, 2010
Decided:
July 12, 2011
Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard H. Milnor, ZUNKA, MILNOR, CARTER & INIGO, LTD.,
Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellants.
Dean E. Lhospital,
SNEATHERN & LHOSPITAL, LLP, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Appeal: 09-1702
Document: 29
Date Filed: 07/12/2011
Page: 2 of 4
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 09-1702
Document: 29
Date Filed: 07/12/2011
Page: 3 of 4
PER CURIAM:
Defendants
their
motion
for
challenge
summary
the
district
judgment
in
court’s
denial
Plaintiff’s
42
of
U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) action, in which they asserted the affirmative
defense
of
qualified
immunity.
Mitchell
v.
appealable,
Such
orders
472
Forsyth,
U.S.
are
511,
immediately
530
(1985),
provided the denial rests on a purely legal determination that
the
facts,
as
viewed
by
the
district
court
at
the
summary
judgment stage, establish a violation of a clearly established
right, Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 319-20 (1995).
example,
the
insufficiency
appealing
of
the
official
evidence
to
“seeks
raise
a
to
If, for
argue
genuine
issue
the
of
material fact, this Court does not possess jurisdiction under
[28
U.S.C.]
§
1291
[(2006)]
to
consider
the
claim.”
Valladares v. Cordero, 552 F.3d 384, 388 (4th Cir. 2009).
We conclude that the district court did not err when
it denied Defendants qualified immunity.
district
court’s
order
denying
We thus affirm the
Defendants’
summary
judgment
motion, as well as its order finding no basis to alter its
previous ruling upon sua sponte reconsideration. *
*
Bellamy v.
Although Defendants ask this court to determine what
remedies are available to Plaintiff based on the conduct about
which he complains, this issue is not “inextricably intertwined”
with the qualified immunity question that is properly before us
on interlocutory appeal.
See Swint v. Chambers Cnty. Comm’n,
(Continued)
3
Appeal: 09-1702
Document: 29
Date Filed: 07/12/2011
Page: 4 of 4
Wells,
No. 5:07-cv-00035-sgw (W.D. Va. May 15, 2009; June 10,
2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before us and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
514 U.S. 35, 51 (1995); Rux v. Republic of Sudan, 461 F.3d 461,
475 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we express no opinion on this
issue.
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?