UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
HENRY EARL MILLER, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:04-cr-00022-HFF-3)
August 20, 2009
August 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON and Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Henry Earl Miller has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking a vacation or reversal of sentence, contending the district court violated Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137 (1995), in convicting him of two firearm counts. is a drastic remedy to be used only in Mandamus
circumstances, when "the petitioner has no other adequate means to obtain relief to which there is a clear and indisputable right." In re Blackwater Sec. Consulting, L.L.C., 460 F.3d 576,
592 (4th Cir. 2006) (internal quotations and citation omitted), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 1381 (2007). reluctant to grant a writ of mandamus." 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987). For the reasons stated by this court in the denial of Miller's present relief. prior actions raising he the is same not issue raised for in the "Courts are extremely In re Beard, 811 F.2d
See In re Miller, 319 F.Appx. 288 (4th Cir. Mar. 27,
2009) (No. 08-7272) motion; In re Miller, (No. 08-207)(4th Cir. July 11, 2008); In re Miller, 279 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. June 03, 2008) (No.08-1433); In re Miller, 256 F. App'x 604 (Nov. 30, 2007) (No. 07-7120). Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We deny Miller's motions for writ of mandamus to be
adjudicated, release pending writ of mandamus proceedings, and 2
to recuse. legal before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
contentions the court
process. PETITION DENIED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?