Irene Vance v. DOWCP
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
IRENE VANCE, widow of Jessie Vance, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; CEDAR COAL CORPORATION, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (08-712-BLA)
February 24, 2010
March 9, 2010
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Irene Vance, Petitioner Pro Se. Steven D. Breeskin, Deputy Commissioner, Rita Ann Roppolo, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; David L. Yaussy, ROBINSON & MCELWEE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Irene Board's judge's decision denial of Vance and seeks order review affirming benefits of the Benefits Review law
administrative to 30
§§ 901-945 (2006). Board's decision
Our review of the record discloses that the is based upon substantial evidence and is
without reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for Vance v. Director, 08-712-BLA (B.R.B. the the the
review for the reasons stated by the Board. Office June 23, facts of Workers' We Comp. Programs, with are and No.
2009). legal before
because in aid
contentions the court
decisional process. PETITION DENIED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?