Matthew Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, In

Filing 920100125

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1852 MATTHEW ENDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RYDER INTEGRATED GROUP, LOGISTICS, INCORPORATED; THE PARKSITE Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:08-cv-03211-JFM; 1:08-cv-03042-JFM) Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: January 25, 2010 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew Enders, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsey Hager McGinnis, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., McLean, Virginia; James R. Pranger, NEAL, GERBER AND EISENBERG, LLC, Chicago, Illinois; Steven D. Silverman, Andrew Clayton White, SILVERMAN, THOMPSON, SLUTKIN & WHITE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Matthew Enders appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for Appellees. record and find no reversible error. the reasons stated by the district Inc., July and 16, We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for court. Nos. 2009). Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, (D. Md. 1:08-cv-03211-JFM; We with deny oral as moot 1:08-cv-03042-JFM Enders' motion to expedite dispense argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?