Michael Rosner v. Judge Fader, II
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL ROSNER, Plaintiff Appellant, v. JUDGE JOHN FADER, II, Individually and in his Official Capacity; STATE OF MARYLAND; CHIEF JUDGE ROBERT BELL; JOHN G. TURNBELL; GORDON, FEINBLATT, R,H, & H, LLC, Res. Agent Herbert Goldman; WILLIAM C. MULFORD, II; STATE OF MARYLANDMARTIN O'MALLEY; JUDGE PAMELA LEE NORTH; SHEILA K. SACHS, Gordon, Feinblatt, R,H, & H, LLC; HERBERT GOLDMAN, Gordon, Feinblatt, R,H, & H, LLC, Defendants Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01923-RDB)
September 24, 2009
October 8, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Rosner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael dismissing his Rosner civil appeals action the district of court's subject order matter
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
raised in the Appellant's Brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and Rosner's brief asserts no argument pertaining to the dispositive issues identified the by the district court. In was any free event, of we
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.
deny Rosner's motion to remove his state court action to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. dispense with oral argument because the facts and We
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?