Michael Rosner v. Judge Fader, II

Filing 920091008

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1857

MICHAEL ROSNER, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. JUDGE JOHN FADER, II, Individually and in his Official Capacity; STATE OF MARYLAND; CHIEF JUDGE ROBERT BELL; JOHN G. TURNBELL; GORDON, FEINBLATT, R,H, & H, LLC, Res. Agent Herbert Goldman; WILLIAM C. MULFORD, II; STATE OF MARYLANDMARTIN O'MALLEY; JUDGE PAMELA LEE NORTH; SHEILA K. SACHS, Gordon, Feinblatt, R,H, & H, LLC; HERBERT GOLDMAN, Gordon, Feinblatt, R,H, & H, LLC, Defendants ­ Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01923-RDB)

Submitted:

September 24, 2009

Decided:

October 8, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Rosner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael dismissing his Rosner civil appeals action the district of court's subject order matter

for

lack

jurisdiction.

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues

raised in the Appellant's Brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and Rosner's brief asserts no argument pertaining to the dispositive issues identified the by the district court. In was any free event, of we

conclude

district

court's

decision

error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.

Further, we

deny Rosner's motion to remove his state court action to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. dispense with oral argument because the facts and We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2