Kamar Adardour v. American Settlements Incorpora

Filing 920100608

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1893 KAMAR ADARDOUR, Plaintiff Appellant, v. AMERICAN SETTLEMENTS INCORPORATED, Settlements Incorporated, Defendant Appellee, and CITI FINANCIAL SERVICES INCORPORATED, trading as Washington Mutual Finance Incorporated, Defendant. trading as Metro Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00798-AJT-TRJ) Submitted: May 17, 2010 Decided: June 8, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl L. Crews, C. LOWELL CREWS, ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Craig L. Sarner, BONNER KIERNAN TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Kamar granting motion Adardour appeals the district court's orders American on Settlements claim Incorporated's under the summary Virginia judgment Consumer Adardour's Protection Act, Va. Code Ann. 59.1-196 to 59.1-207 (2006 & Supp. 2009), and her claim for tortious interference with contractual relationship. * no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. See Adardour v. American Settlements Inc., No. 1:08-cv-00798-AJT-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed June 23, 2009, entered June 24, 2009; July 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED The district court had diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332 (2006), and we exercise jurisdiction over the district court's final judgment under 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006). * 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?