Debbie Hughey v. Greenville Hospital System

Filing 920091120

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1933 DEBBIE HUGHEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREENVILLE HOSPITAL SYSTEM, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:07-cv-00297-HFF) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 20, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Debbie Hughey, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Allen Bright, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Debbie Hughey appeals the district court's order The denying relief on her employment discrimination complaint. district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) relief be (2006). denied and The magistrate Hughey judge that recommended that advised failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Hughey failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The magistrate timely filing of specific is objections to to a judge's recommendation necessary preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been v. warned of the 766 consequences F.2d 841, of noncompliance. Wright Collins, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Hughey has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional Accordingly, would process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?