Debbie Hughey v. Greenville Hospital System

Filing 920091120

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1933

DEBBIE HUGHEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREENVILLE HOSPITAL SYSTEM, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:07-cv-00297-HFF)

Submitted:

November 17, 2009

Decided:

November 20, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Debbie Hughey, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Allen Bright, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Debbie Hughey appeals the district court's order The

denying relief on her employment discrimination complaint.

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) relief be (2006). denied and The magistrate Hughey judge that

recommended

that

advised

failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Hughey failed to object

to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The magistrate timely filing of specific is objections to to a

judge's

recommendation

necessary

preserve

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been v. warned of the 766 consequences F.2d 841, of

noncompliance.

Wright

Collins,

845-46

(4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Hughey has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional Accordingly,

would

process. AFFIRMED 2