City of Durham v. Iris Wadsworth
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CITY OF DURHAM; COUNTY OF DURHAM, Political subdivisions of the State of North Carolina, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. IRIS WADSWORTH; EMMETT W. CALDWELL, Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00425-NCT-PTS) Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 26, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Iris Wadsworth, Emmett W. Caldwell, Appellants Pro Se. Page Watson, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Iris Wadsworth and Emmett W. Caldwell appeal the
district court's order affirming the magistrate judge's order denying their motion for an extension of time within which to file objections to the magistrate judge's report and
recommendation. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). The order Appellants seek to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dispense with oral argument because the facts and We
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?