Monica Serwaah v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Filing 920100625

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1952 MONICA SERWAAH, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: June 15, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010 Before SHEDD and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fatai A. Suleman, AMITY, KUM & SULEMAN, PA, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Ethan B. Kanter, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jeffrey L. Menkin, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Monica Serwaah, a native and citizen of Ghana, seeks review of an her order appeal from of of the the Board of Immigration Judge's Appeals decision the due dismissing denying Immigration We that to relief removal. and find have reviewed procedural of administrative process claim, record her Serwaah's the denial challenge voluntary departure, and her claim that the time period calculation for the relief sought was miscalculated were not properly exhausted before the Board, and thus are not subject to review. U.S.C. 1252(d)(1) (2006). See 8 Next, we have considered Serwaah's challenge to the agency finding that she failed to qualify for cancellation of removal and find her claims to be without merit. See 8 U.S.C. 1229b(b)(1)(B) (2006). Accordingly, we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. facts and legal before We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the contentions the court materials would decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?