Nigist Assefa v. Eric Holder, Jr.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
NIGIST ASSEFA; EMANUEL TESFAYE, Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
April 8, 2010
June 1, 2010
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dev A. Kayal, Silver Spring, Maryland; Joseph C. Hohenstein, ORLOW, KAPLAN & HOHENSTEIN, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Petitioners. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Senior Litigation Counsel, Edward E. Wiggers, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Nigist Assefa and her son, Emanuel Tesfaye, natives and citizens of Ethiopia, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying their motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review. The denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion. novo. The Board's legal conclusions are reviewed de
INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); Zheng v.
Holder, 562 F.3d 647, 651 (4th Cir. 2009); Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, or 744 any (4th errors Cir. of 2006). law in We the find no abuse of
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. oral argument because in the the facts and legal before
We dispense with contentions the court are and
argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?