Timothy Williams v. Force Protection Industries In

Filing 920100423

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2033

TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FORCE PROTECTION INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED; HOWARD EISENHUT, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated; SHELIA BOYD, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated; VANESSA LADSON, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated; HELEN GEARHEARD, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated; BRENDA VALENTINE, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (2:07-cv-03679-MBS)

Submitted:

April 7, 2010

Decided:

April 23, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Carrouth, FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM: Timothy accepting the Williams appeals of the the district court's judge order and

recommendation

magistrate

granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and raising related claims under state law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Force Protection Industries Inc., No. 2:07(D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral

cv-03679-MBS

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

3