Timothy Williams v. Force Protection Industries In
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FORCE PROTECTION INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED; HOWARD EISENHUT, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated; SHELIA BOYD, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated; VANESSA LADSON, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated; HELEN GEARHEARD, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated; BRENDA VALENTINE, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (2:07-cv-03679-MBS)
April 7, 2010
April 23, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Carrouth, FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Timothy accepting the Williams appeals of the the district court's judge order and
granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and raising related claims under state law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Force Protection Industries Inc., No. 2:07(D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?