In re: Gregory Rice
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
GREGORY RICE, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
November 19, 2009
December 1, 2009
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Rice, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gregory Rice petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order to enforce a security agreement in a civil action
dismissed by the district court. entitled to mandamus relief.
We conclude that Rice is not
Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Loan Ass'n, is 860 a F.2d drastic 135, 138 (4th and In re First Fed. Sav. & Cir. 1988). only be Further, used in
Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for
In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.
The relief sought by Rice is not available by way of mandamus. mandamus. legal before Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
contentions the court
process. PETITION DENIED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?