Michael Moment v. Martin O'Malley

Filing 920100302

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2090

MICHAEL MOMENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY; DOUGLAS F. GANSLER; ISIAH LEGGEIL; ANN HARRINGTON; THOMAS L. CRAVEN; BRIAN G. KIM; JESSICA M. HALL; JOHN M. STAYER; MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-02209-AW)

Submitted:

February 25, 2010

Decided:

March 2, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Moment, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael Moment appeals the district court's order

dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and we affirm for the

Accordingly,

reasons stated by the district court.

Moment v. O'Malley, No.

8:09-cv-02209-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 16, 2009; entered Sept. 17, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in the the materials decisional

would

aid

process. AFFIRMED

Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923).

2