Michael Moment v. Martin O'Malley
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL MOMENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY; DOUGLAS F. GANSLER; ISIAH LEGGEIL; ANN HARRINGTON; THOMAS L. CRAVEN; BRIAN G. KIM; JESSICA M. HALL; JOHN M. STAYER; MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-02209-AW)
February 25, 2010
March 2, 2010
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Moment, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael Moment appeals the district court's order
dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Moment v. O'Malley, No.
8:09-cv-02209-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 16, 2009; entered Sept. 17, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in the the materials decisional
Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?