Karen Amaya v. Prince George's County
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:08-cv-00443-AW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998528997] [09-2101]
Case: 09-2101
Document: 20
Date Filed: 02/22/2011
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2101
KAREN AMAYA,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY,
POLICE DEPARTMENT,
MARYLAND;
PRINCE
GEORGE’S
COUNTY
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:08-cv-00443-AW)
Submitted:
October 7, 2010
Decided:
February 22, 2011
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karen Amaya, Appellant Pro Se.
Brennan Christopher McCarthy,
Associate
County
Attorney,
Upper
Marlboro,
Maryland,
for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Case: 09-2101
Document: 20
Date Filed: 02/22/2011
Page: 2
PER CURIAM:
Karen Amaya seeks to appeal the district court’s order
granting
Defendants’
summary
judgment
motion
on
her
discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010).
The record does
not contain a transcript of the summary judgment proceedings.
An appellant has the burden of including in the record on appeal
a transcript of all parts of the proceedings material to the
issues raised on appeal.
See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R.
10(b). An appellant proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis is
entitled to transcripts at government expense only in certain
circumstances.
produce
a
28
transcript
U.S.C.
or
§
to
753(f)
qualify
(2006).
for
the
By
failing
production
of
to
a
transcript at government expense, Amaya has waived review of the
issues on appeal that depend upon the transcript to show error.
See
Powell
v.
Estelle,
959
F.2d
22,
26
(5th
Cir.
1992);
Keller v. Prince George’s Cnty., 827 F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th Cir.
1987).
the
As no error appears on the record before us, we affirm
district
court’s
order.
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?