Miles Waters v. Maryland Department of Transp


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:08-cv-00396-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998435944] [09-2120]

Download PDF
Miles Waters v. Maryland Department of Transp Doc. 0 Case: 09-2120 Document: 38 Date Filed: 09/30/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2120 MILES L. WATERS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION; GEORGE ATKINSON, Manager Motor Vehicle Administration Employee & Administration Services Support Services; MILTON CHAFEE, Chief Deputy Administrator Motor Vehicle Administration; CARMEN CARRUBA, Motor Vehicle Administration, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00396-WDQ) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General of Maryland, Robert C. Cain, II, Assistant Attorney General, Glen Burnie, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 09-2120 Document: 38 Date Filed: 09/30/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Miles L. Waters appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' summary judgment motion on his retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010), and 42 U.S.C. 1981, 1983 (2006), and entering judgment in Defendants' favor. find no reversible error. court's order. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm the district See Waters v. Maryland Dep't of Transp., No. We dispense with oral 1:08-cv-00396-WDQ (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2009). argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?