Ava Sawyer v. Dean Worcester

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to dismiss appeal as moot [998469866-2] Originating case number: 1:09-cv-00431-LMB-IDD,07-13021-RGM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998482170] [09-2131, 09-2133]

Ava Sawyer v. Dean Worcester

Doc. 0

Case: 09-2131 Document: 24

Date Filed: 12/09/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2131 In Re: AVA MAUREEN SAWYER, Debtor. -------------------------AVA MAUREEN SAWYER, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. DEAN S. WORCESTER, Defendant ­ Appellee, and ESTATE OF PRESTON CONNER, SR., Creditor.

No. 09-2133 In Re: AVA MAUREEN SAWYER, Debtor. -------------------------AVA MAUREEN SAWYER, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 09-2131 Document: 24

Date Filed: 12/09/2010

Page: 2

DEAN S. WORCESTER, Defendant ­ Appellee, v. ESTATE OF PRESTON CONNER, Movant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00431-LMB-IDD; 1:09-cv-00298-LMB-IDD; 07-13021-RGM) Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 9, 2010

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ava Maureen Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. John David Griffin, Deborah Campbell Welsh, WINCHESTER LAW GROUP P.C., Winchester, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Case: 09-2131 Document: 24

Date Filed: 12/09/2010

Page: 3

PER CURIAM: In seeks to these consolidated the district appeals, court's Ava orders Maureen Sawyer the

appeal

affirming

bankruptcy court's orders overruling Sawyer's objection to the validity of the Appellee's claim in her Chapter 13 proceeding and denying her motions for reconsideration. the record and find no reversible error. for the reasons Nos. stated by the We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm court. Sawyer v.

district

Worcester,

1:09-cv-00431-LMB-IDD;

1:09-cv-00298-LMB-IDD;

07-13021-RGM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 26, 2009 & entered Aug. 27, 2009; Aug. 31, 2009). dismiss the appeals for The Appellees have filed a motion to failure to prosecute. We deny the

motion as moot. facts and legal before

We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the

materials

would

decisional process. AFFIRMED

3