Harold Hodge, Jr. v. Calvert County

Filing 920100524

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2138

HAROLD H. HODGE, JR.; CHANTE' N. HODGE, Mrs., Plaintiffs ­ Appellants, v. CALVERT COUNTY, (local government); STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND STATE TREASURER; ST. MARY'S COUNTY, (local government); TIMOTHY K. CAMERON, Head Sheriff in his individual and public official capacity; THOMAS HEDDERICH, Detective, in his individual and public official capacity; WILLIAM RAY, Detective, in his individual and public official capacity; UNKNOWN SWAT TEAM AND POLICE MEMBERS, John Does in their individual and public official capacities; MIKE EVANS, Head Sheriff, in his individual and public official capacity; RICKEY COX, Deputy, Detective, in his individual and public official capacity; RICKY THOMAS, Lieutenant, in his individual and public official capacity; SUTTON, Deputy or Sheriff, in his individual and public official capacity; CANNING, Deputy Sheriff, in his individual and public official capacity; FENTON, Deputy Sheriff, in his individual and public official capacity; UNKNOWN (SOT), SWAT TEAM MEMBER OF THE CLAVERT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, John Does in their individual and public official capacities; ROBERT B. RIDDLE, Judge, in his individual capacity and public official capacity; CALVERT DETENTION CENTER; SHERIFF AND DEPUTY AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, last name to be Fenton in his individual and public official capacity; SHERIFF AND DEPUTY SUTTON, in his individual and public official capacity, Defendants ­ Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:09-cv-02252-PJM)

Submitted:

May 20, 2010

Decided:

May 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold H. Hodge, Jr., Chante' N. Hodge, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM: Harold H. Hodge, Jr., and Chante' N. Hodge appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.

Hodge v. Calvert County, We dispense with contentions the court are and

No. 8:09-cv-02252-PJM (D. Md. Sept. 4, 2009). oral argument because in the the facts and legal before

adequately

presented

materials

argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

3