Owen Silvious v. AFNI, Incorporated
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:07-cv-00145-FPS-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998537726] [09-2164]
Owen Silvious v. AFNI, Incorporated
Doc. 0
Case: 09-2164
Document: 28
Date Filed: 03/04/2011
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2164
OWEN FRANKLIN SILVIOUS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. AFNI, INCORPORATED, Defendant Appellee, and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED; ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INCORPORATED; ACCOUNT SERVICES; APPLIED CARD BANK; CREDIGY RECEIVABLES, INCORPORATED; CREDIT ONE BANK; LTD FINANCIAL SERVICES, LP, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00145-FPS-JES)
Submitted:
February 28, 2011
Decided:
March 4, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Owen Franklin Silvious, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Todd Booth, BOOTH & MCCARTHY, Bridgeport, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 09-2164
Document: 28
Date Filed: 03/04/2011
Page: 2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Case: 09-2164
Document: 28
Date Filed: 03/04/2011
Page: 3
PER CURIAM: Owen Franklin Silvious seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting of the for and adopting judge, judgment, the the report and AFNI,
recommendation Incorporated's Silvious' civil
magistrate summary We dismiss
granting and
motion
dismissing lack of
action.
appeal
for
jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal,
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). "[T]he timely
filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on August 3, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed sixty-three Because Silvious failed to file
days later, on October 5, 2009. *
a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. oral
*
We dispense with contentions are
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
3
Case: 09-2164
Document: 28
Date Filed: 03/04/2011
Page: 4
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?