Dhiraj Chhaparwal v. WV College of Medicine
Filing
402835517
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998219410-3]. Originating case number: 1:07-cv-00089-FPS-JSK. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998355568] [09-2165]
Dhiraj Chhaparwal v. WV College of Medicine
Doc. 402835517
Case: 09-2165
Document: 23
Date Filed: 06/09/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2165 DHIRAJ CHHAPARWAL, Plaintiff Appellant, v. WEST VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER; UNIVERSITY HEALTH ASSOCIATES; NORMAN FERRARI, III, M.D.; MARTIN WEISSE, M.D.; MATHEW BRUNNER, M.D.; NANCY BRUNNER, M.D.; KATHLEEN PERKINS, M.D.; JENNIFER PUMPHREY, M.D.; JEAN SOMESHWAR, M.D.; MELISSA LARZO, M.D.; MEGAN TROISCHT, M.D.; HEATHER HIXENBAUGH, M.D.; MICHAEL WOLFE; JOHN/JANE DOES I-X, Defendants Appellees, and WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, MCCLYMONDS, President and CEO, Defendants. INCORPORATED; BRUCE
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00089-FPS-JSK) Submitted: May 18, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 09-2165
Document: 23
Date Filed: 06/09/2010
Page: 2
Dhiraj Chhaparwal, Appellant Pro Se. Christi R.B. Stover, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Morgantown, West Virginia; Richard Michael Yurko, Jr., STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Case: 09-2165
Document: 23
Date Filed: 06/09/2010
Page: 3
PER CURIAM: Dhiraj Chhaparwal appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on
Chhaparwal's complaint. reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Chhaparwal v. WV College of Medicine, We also
by the district court.
No. 1:07-cv-00089-FPS-JSK (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 9, 2009).
deny Chhaparwal's motion for transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?