George Blackwell, Sr. v. Paula Smith
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
GEORGE W. BLACKWELL, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAULA Y. SMITH, Dr.; PHILLIP STOVER, M.D.; BOYD BENNETT; THEODIS BECK; KENNETH TEAGUE; TONY SMITH, Defendants - Appellees, and SHANG-HSIEN STANLEY YUAN; RICK ANDERSON; FMCU, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00526-GCM)
April 29, 2010
May 3, 2010
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George W. Blackwell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: George W. Blackwell, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil action. We dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). "[T]he timely
filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." The Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). district court's judgment was entered on the
docket on October 8, 2009. November 10, 2009.
The notice of appeal was filed on
Because Blackwell failed to file a timely
notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED Blackwell's claims against Defendants Paula Smith, M.D., and Phillip Stover, M.D., were dismissed without prejudice. The remainder of Blackwell's claims were dismissed with prejudice.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?