Independence Federal Savings v. Jay Briley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998409074-2], [998385415-2], [998338250-2], [998329507-2], [998329500-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998329513-2], [998296493-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cv-01189-LO-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998412001] [09-2314]

Independence Federal Savings v. Jay Briley

Doc. 0

Case: 09-2314 Document: 40

Date Filed: 08/26/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2314 INDEPENDENCE FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff ­ Appellee, v. JAY BONANZA BRILEY; CONSTANCE H. BRILEY, Defendants ­ Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O'Grady, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01189-LO-JFA) Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 26, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jay Bonanza Briley; Constance H. Briley, Appellants Pro Se. Stephen Warren Nichols, COOTER, MANGOLD, TOMPERT & KARAS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 09-2314 Document: 40

Date Filed: 08/26/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Jay and Constance Briley appeal the district court's order granting Independence Federal Savings Bank's summary

judgment motion on its breach of contract claim.

The Brileys

have also filed several motions in this court, including motions for appointment of counsel, for dismissal of judgment, and for the Bank to provide documentation of tax relief it allegedly received. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we deny the pending motions and affirm the Independence Fed. Sav.

district court's order and judgment.

Bank v. Briley, No. 1:08-cv-01189-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 27, 2009 & entered Oct. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

2