Robert Berkowitz v. US


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:09-cv-00651-HMH-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998452021] [09-2328]

Download PDF
Robert Berkowitz v. US Doc. 0 Case: 09-2328 Document: 14 Date Filed: 10/25/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2328 ROBERT ALAN BERKOWITZ, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, The; WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.; BANK OF ANDERSON, NA; CARECREDIT, INCORPORATED - GE MONEY COMPANY; CITY OF ANDERSON; BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA; DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MISSOURI; CIGNA HEALTHCARE BENEFITS, INCORPORATED; CIGNA CORPORATION; METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY LEASING CORPORATION; BARTON R. BRIGHT, III, a/k/a Chip; NATIONAL PROCESSING COMPANY; GLOBAL PAYMENTS, INCORPORATED; ELAVON, INCORPORATED; CHASE PAYMENTECH; BANK OF AMERICA; FIFTH THIRD BANK OPERATIONS; LEGAL ENTRY MD IMOC2Q; FIRST DATA MERCHANT SERVICES CORPORATION; HPSC, INCORPORATED - GE HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SERVICES; GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORPORATION; DF SERVICES, LLC, Respondents Appellees, and PATTERSON DENTAL SUPPLY, INCORPORATED, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:09-cv-00651-HMH-BHH) Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010 Case: 09-2328 Document: 14 Date Filed: 10/25/2010 Page: 2 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Alan Berkowitz, Appellant Pro Se. George John Conits, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina; Laurie Allyn Snyder, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Case: 09-2328 Document: 14 Date Filed: 10/25/2010 Page: 3 PER CURIAM: Robert Alan Berkowitz seeks to appeal the district court's order denying in part and granting in part the United States' motion to dismiss some, but not all, of the respondents in his petition to quash summonses issued by the Internal Revenue Service upon third-party record-keepers. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., to 337 U.S. is 541, 545-46 a (1949). final The order an Berkowitz seeks appeal neither order nor appealable interlocutory or collateral order. dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument because in the the facts and legal before Accordingly, we We dispense with contentions the court are and adequately presented materials argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?