Woodrow Thompson, III v. Novapro Risk Solutions, LP
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01755-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998449320] [09-2402]
Woodrow Thompson, III v. Novapro Risk Solutions, LP
Doc. 0
Case: 09-2402 Document: 26
Date Filed: 10/20/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2402 WOODROW B. THOMPSON, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NOVAPRO RISK SOLUTIONS, LP; CYNTHIA D. SADLER, Individually and as Employee and Agent for: NOVA PRO RISK SOLUTIONS, LP; DIANE SMITH, Individually and as Employee and Agent for: NOVA PRO RISK SOLUTIONS, LP, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-01755-WDQ) Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010
Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mercedes C. Samborsky, Joppa, Maryland, for Appellant. Alan S. Block, A. David Freeman, BONNER KIERNAN TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Washington, D.C.; David A. Rosenberg, FORD & HARRISON, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 09-2402 Document: 26
Date Filed: 10/20/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Woodrow B. Thompson, III, appeals the district court's order denying his motion to remand all federal and state
employment discrimination claims to state court.
We review de See
novo the district court's denial of the motion to remand.
Moffitt v. Residential Funding, Co., LLC, 604 F.3d 156, 159 (4th Cir. 2010). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Thompson v. Novapro Risk Solutions, LP, No. We dispense with oral
district court.
1:09-cv-01755-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 10, 2009).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?