US v. Brian Champagne
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRIAN CHAMPAGNE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:06-cr-00481-RWT-1)
July 30, 2009
December 28, 2009
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Meghan Suzanne Skelton, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenbelt, Maryland; James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Daniel J. Fortune, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Mara B. Zusman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Brian sentence. Champagne seeks to appeal his conviction and
In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice Fed. R.
of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A).
With or without a motion, upon a showing of
excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed.
R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court entered judgment on
January 9, 2007. 2008. appeal Because or to
The notice of appeal was filed on August 22, Champagne failed to file a timely notice of
dismiss the appeal. facts and legal before
We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
contentions the court
decisional process. DISMISSED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?