US v. Marcus Gossett
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARCUS GOSSETT, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:02-cr-00248-GRA-23)
December 16, 2009
February 2, 2010
Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin T. Stepp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. W. Walter Wilkins, United States Attorney, E. Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Marcus revoking his Gossett appeals release the and district sentencing court's him to order five
months in prison, followed by a five-year term of supervised release. Gossett argues that the district court's orally
pronounced sentence conflicts with the written judgment. Where a conflict exists between an orally pronounced sentence and the written judgment, the oral sentence controls. Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(c) ("`[S]entencing' means the oral
announcement of the sentence."); United States v. Osborne, 345 F.3d 281, 283 n.1 (4th Cir. 2003). The record establishes that
the district court imposed a five-month active prison term to be followed by a five-year term of supervised release, in its oral pronouncement of the sentence. recited conflict in the written the This is precisely the sentence Thus, in there open is simply no
sentence reflected in the written judgment. oral pronouncement of sentence
Nor do we find the or unclear.
Accordingly, we affirm.
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?