US v. Xavier Blackwood
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying as moot Motion to remand case [998679806-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00258-WO-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998696944].. [09-4762]
Appeal: 09-4762
Document: 32
Date Filed: 10/11/2011
Page: 1 of 4
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-4762
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
XAVIER ANTWONE BLACKWOOD,
Defendant - Appellant.
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.
(S. Ct. No. 09-11213)
Submitted:
September 22, 2011
Decided:
October 11, 2011
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by unpublished
per curiam opinion.
Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William S.
Trivette, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellant.
Terry Michael Meinecke, Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Greensboro,
North
Carolina,
for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 09-4762
Document: 32
Date Filed: 10/11/2011
Page: 2 of 4
PER CURIAM:
Xavier
Antwone
Blackwood
pled
guilty
pursuant
to
a
written plea agreement to maintaining a drug-involved premises,
21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1), (b) (2006), and possession of a firearm
after having previously been convicted of a crime punishable by
imprisonment
for
§§ 922(g)(1),
Information
a
term
924(a)(2)
of
Prior
exceeding
(2006).
Conviction
one
The
pursuant
year,
18
Government
to
21
U.S.C.
filed
U.S.C.
§
an
851
(2006), stating that Blackwood committed the subject offenses
after a prior state felony drug conviction for possession with
intent to sell and deliver cocaine (two counts) became final.
Blackwood was sentenced to eighty-five months’ imprisonment.
On
appeal, counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386
U.S.
738
meritorious
(1967),
issues
for
stating
in
appeal,
his
but
view
there
questioning
were
whether
no
the
district court erred in finding Blackwood’s prior North Carolina
drug conviction for which Blackwood received a sentence of six
to eight months “a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term
exceeding
affirmed
one
the
year”
under
district
18
U.S.C.
court’s
§
judgment.
922(g).
United
This
court
States
v.
Blackwood, No. 09-4762, 2010 WL 707682 (4th Cir. Mar. 2, 2010)
(unpublished).
On October 4, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United
States granted Blackwood’s petition for a writ of certiorari,
2
Appeal: 09-4762
Document: 32
Date Filed: 10/11/2011
Page: 3 of 4
vacated this court’s judgment and remanded the case for further
consideration in light of Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 560 U.S.
__, 130 S. Ct. 2577 (2010).
On March 23, 2011, the appeal was
placed in abeyance for United States v. Simmons, 649 F.3d 237,
2011
WL
3607266
(4th
Cir.
Aug.
17,
2011)
(en
banc).
On
September 16, 2011, Blackwood filed a joint motion to remand for
resentencing
in
light
of
Simmons.
We
affirm
Blackwood’s
conviction for maintaining a drug-involved premises, vacate the
§ 922(g)
court
conviction
for
and
sentence
reconsideration
of
the
and
remand
conviction
to
the
and
district
sentence
in
light of Carachuri-Rosendo and Simmons.
In
Simmons,
this
court
held
that
a
North
Carolina
offense may not be classified as a felony based upon the maximum
aggravated sentence that could be imposed upon a repeat offender
if
the
individual
sentence.
N.C.
defendant
was
not
eligible
for
such
See Simmons, 2011 WL 3607266, at *3, *7-*8.
Gen.
Stat.
§ 15A-1340.17(c)-(d),
assuming
a
Under
counsel’s
assertions in his Anders brief are correct, the most Blackwood
faced
at
sentencing
Blackwood’s
May
22,
was
2006
eight
months.
conviction
Thus,
should
under
not
have
Simmons,
been
a
predicate felony for the § 922(g) conviction because it was not
punishable by a sentence exceeding a year.
In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the record
in this case and have found no other meritorious issues for
3
Appeal: 09-4762
Document: 32
appeal.
for
Date Filed: 10/11/2011
Page: 4 of 4
We therefore affirm Blackwood’s conviction and sentence
maintaining
a
drug-involved
premises,
vacate
Blackwood’s
conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a
firearm
and
remand
with
consider
the
conviction
Rosendo
and
Simmons
directions
and
and
that
the
in
light
sentence
that
the
court
district
of
court
Carachuri-
should
make
the
determination in the first instance as to whether the predicate
conviction is a felony or misdemeanor and that the conviction
should be reimposed if the predicate conviction is determined to
be a felony.
We deny as moot the joint motion to remand for
resentencing.
Blackwood,
This
in
writing,
court
of
requires
the
right
to
that
counsel
petition
Court of the United States for further review.
the
inform
Supreme
If Blackwood
requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that
such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in
this court for leave to withdraw from representation.
Counsel’s
motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Blackwood.
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART,
VACATED IN PART,
AND REMANDED
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?