US v. Marta Perry

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:09-cr-00106-FL-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998703822].. [09-5062]

Appeal: 09-5062

Document: 47

Date Filed: 10/19/2011

Page: 1 of 3

ON REHEARING
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-5062

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MARTA ERWIN PERRY,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:09-cr-00106-FL-1)

Submitted:

September 30, 2011

Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.

KING,

Circuit

Decided:

Judges,

and

October 19, 2011

HAMILTON,

Senior

Reversed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois,
Assistant Federal Public Defender, Eric J. Brignac, Research and
Writing Specialist, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.
George E. B. Holding, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes,
William M. Gilmore, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-5062

Document: 47

Date Filed: 10/19/2011

Page: 2 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Marta Erwin Perry pleaded guilty to possession of a
firearm

after

punishable

by

having
a

previously

term

of

been

imprisonment

convicted
exceeding

of

a

one

crime

year,

in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006), conditioned on his
right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to
dismiss the indictment.

The district court sentenced Perry to

eighty-four months of imprisonment.

This court affirmed his

conviction on appeal in reliance upon our decision in United
States

v.

406

F.3d

Perry,

States v.

Harp,

384

F.

242

(4th
249

App’x

Cir.

2005).

(2010)

See

United

(unpublished).

We

subsequently granted Perry’s petition for rehearing, based upon
the Supreme Court’s decision in Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 130
S. Ct. 2577 (2010).
conviction

based

on

Perry has now filed a motion to vacate his
this

court’s

recent

decision

in

United

States v. Simmons, 2011 WL 3607266 (Aug. 17, 2011) (en banc).
For the reasons that follow, we reverse Perry’s conviction.
Perry’s

prior

convictions

consisted

Class H felonies under North Carolina law.

of

Class

I

and

Moreover, at the

time of his convictions, Perry’s prior record level was never
above a level II.

Under North Carolina law, the maximum term of

imprisonment for a Class H felony with a record level of II is
twelve months, and the maximum term for a Class I felony is ten
months.

See

N.C.

Gen.

Stat.
2

§

15A-1340.17(d)

(2007).

Appeal: 09-5062

Document: 47

Date Filed: 10/19/2011

Page: 3 of 3

Therefore, Perry could not have received a term of imprisonment
exceeding twelve months for his prior convictions.
In

Simmons,

we

determined

that

an

offense

is

not

punishable by a term exceeding one year of imprisonment if the
defendant could not have actually received more than one year of
imprisonment

for

that

offense,

history and other factors.

based

on

his

prior

criminal

As Perry could not have received a

term exceeding one year of imprisonment for his prior offenses,
he did not have a qualifying predicate offense for a conviction
under § 922(g)(1).

Therefore, Perry is innocent of the offense

of conviction.
Accordingly,

we

reverse

the

judgment,

deny

Perry’s

motion to vacate as moot, and remand for further proceedings.
The

clerk

dispense

is
with

directed
oral

to

issue

argument

the

because

mandate
the

forthwith.

facts

and

We
legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

REVERSED AND REMANDED

3