Beautanous Coor v. Patricia Stansberry

Filing 920090629

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6026

BEAUTANOUS COOR, Petitioner - Appellant, v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-6214

BEAUTANOUS COOR, Petitioner - Appellant, v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00061-REP)

Submitted:

June 22, 2009

Decided:

June 29, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

No. 09-6026 dismissed; No. 09-6214 affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Beautanous Coor, Assistant United Appellee.

Appellant Pro Se. Robin Elaine Perrin, States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Beautanous Coor, a

federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying his motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel (No. 09-6026), and appeals the

district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition (No. 09-6214). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral 54(b); (1949). neither a orders, v. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 Indus. to (2006); Loan Fed. R. Civ. U.S. P. 541 is or

Cohen The

Beneficial Coor

Corp., in

337

order

seeks nor an

appeal

No.

09-6026

final

order

appealable

interlocutory

collateral order. for lack of

Accordingly, we dismiss appeal No. 09-6026 Coor v. Stansberry, No. 3:08-cv-

jurisdiction.

00061-REP (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 12, 2008, entered Dec. 13, 2008). We affirm No. 09-6214 for the reasons stated by the district reversible court, error. having Coor reviewed v. the record No. and found no

Stansberry,

3:08-cv-00061-REP

(E.D. Va. filed Dec. 31, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. No. 09-6026 DISMISSED No. 09-6214 AFFIRMED 3