Beautanous Coor v. Patricia Stansberry
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
BEAUTANOUS COOR, Petitioner - Appellant, v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Respondent - Appellee.
BEAUTANOUS COOR, Petitioner - Appellant, v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00061-REP)
June 22, 2009
June 29, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
No. 09-6026 dismissed; No. 09-6214 affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beautanous Coor, Assistant United Appellee.
Appellant Pro Se. Robin Elaine Perrin, States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Beautanous Coor, a
federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying his motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel (No. 09-6026), and appeals the
district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition (No. 09-6214). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral 54(b); (1949). neither a orders, v. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 Indus. to (2006); Loan Fed. R. Civ. U.S. P. 541 is or
seeks nor an
collateral order. for lack of
Accordingly, we dismiss appeal No. 09-6026 Coor v. Stansberry, No. 3:08-cv-
00061-REP (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 12, 2008, entered Dec. 13, 2008). We affirm No. 09-6214 for the reasons stated by the district reversible court, error. having Coor reviewed v. the record No. and found no
(E.D. Va. filed Dec. 31, 2008).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. No. 09-6026 DISMISSED No. 09-6214 AFFIRMED 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?