Frederick Banks v. United States Attorney
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; COUNSELOR JACKSON; BRUCE PEARSON; HARLEY LAPPIN; LARRY RANDLE; CONSTANCE REESE; CHAPLAIN HOLSTEN; CHAPLAIN WILLIAMS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON; JERRY BARBER, Correctional Officer; GERALD BRATCHER; MCCUTCHON; SOUTHERLAND; KATHERYN LAWSON, Doctor; CHRISTOPHER CURRY; MILDRED GREER; EDEN WHITE; COUNSELOR GRIFFEN; CAMERON LINDSEY; MARC RENDA; ART ROBERTS; JULIE NICKLIN; WALTER HARRIS; D. GREEN; DENISE BREWER; PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY; CHAPLAIN ZICKEFOOSE; CHAPLAIN ROBINSON, Respondents Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:08-hc-02117-BO)
August 20, 2009
October 14, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court's order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the
Banks v. United States Attorney, No. 5:08-hc-02117-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 2008). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?