Richard Hatch v. Dominic Gutierrez, Sr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:07-cv-00104-REM-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998457636] [09-6308]

Download PDF
Richard Hatch v. Dominic Gutierrez, Sr. Doc. 0 Case: 09-6308 Document: 16 Date Filed: 11/02/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6308 RICHARD HATCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DOMINIC A. GUTIERREZ, SR.; WAYNE PHILLIPS, Warden; LEWIS BRESCOACH, Health Services Administrator; VERONICA FERNANDEZ, Case Management Coordinator; DANIEL J. HICKEY, DMD, Chief Dental Officer; RENEE CROGAN, Assistant Health Administrator, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:07-cv-00104-REM-JSK) Submitted: July 31, 2009 Decided: November 2, 2010 Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Hatch, Appellant Pro Se. Betsy C. Jividen, Assistant United States Attorney, Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 09-6308 Document: 16 Date Filed: 11/02/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Richard Hatch appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hatch v. Gutierrez, No. 2:07-cv-00104-REM-JSK (N.D. W. We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the Va. Feb. 11, 2009). facts and legal before contentions the court materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?