Mack Myers v. South Carolina Department of C

Filing 920090902

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6387 MACK NEIL MYERS, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WARDEN BURTT; D. MCGEE, Lieutenant; K. MYERS, Sergeant; JENKIN, Correctional Officer; FORDHAM, Correctional Officer; ANDREW LLOYD, JR., Correctional Officer, Defendants ­ Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:08-cv-00589-HMH) Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mack Neil Myers, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene P. Corrigan, III, Jacqueline Gottfried Grau, GRIMBALL & CABANISS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mack Neil Myers appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, See we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Myers v. South Carolina Dep't of Corr., No. 0:08-cv-00589-HMH (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2009). We deny as moot Myers's motion to deny We dispense with oral argument Defendants' motion to remand. because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?