US v. Dennis Holland
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. DENNIS HOLLAND, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas David Schroeder, District Judge. (1:03-cr-00264-TDS-1)
October 27, 2009
December 14, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Holland, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dennis denying Holland's Holland motion appeals to the district court's to order file a
substantial assistance motion. find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Holland, We dispense
No. 1:03-cr-00264-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 2009).
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?