William Couch v. R. Mathena
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM R. COUCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. R. MATHENA; DONALD VASS; LARRY HUFFMAN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Magistrate Judge. (7:08-cv-00518-mfu)
July 30, 2009
August 5, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William R. Couch, Appellant Pro Se. William Wayne Muse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: William R. Couch appeals the magistrate judge's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and
subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. * record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for See Couch v. Mathena,
the reasons stated by the district court.
No. 7:08-cv-00518-mfu (W.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2009 & Feb. 20, 2009). We grant Couch's motion to correct and supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
This case was decided by the magistrate judge upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?