Timmie Locklear v. Hope Harrison
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
TIMMIE RUSSELL LOCKLEAR, Plaintiff Appellant, v. HOPE HARRISON; NURSE PADGETT; NICKOLUS D. VAUG; PAULA SMITH, Defendants Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:08-ct-03132-H)
September 28, 2009
October 8, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timmie Russell Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Timmie Russell Locklear appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we deny
and find that this appeal is frivolous.
Locklear's motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for the reasons No. stated by the district court.
Locklear v. 2009). legal before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?